Re: gh_enter reconsidered

[Klaus Schilling <Klaus.Schilling@home.ivm.de>]

Russell McManus writes:
 > Klaus Schilling <Klaus.Schilling@home.ivm.de> writes:
 > 
 > > I've tried to look through the sources of Elk, another extensible
 > > scheme interpreter which seems to avoid the embedding problems of
 > > main, but couldn't figure how it's done there.
 > 
 > Maybe we should support gh_enter, because it's portable but intrusive,
 > but also provide less portable and less intrusive alternatives.

Why are non-intrusive interpreters less-portable? Perl looks pretty portable.

    Klaus Schilling