Guile Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)

To: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
From: Per Bothner <bothner@cygnus.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 06:53:18 -0800
cc: guile@cygnus.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Oct 1998 22:45:13 EDT." <199810250245.WAA09297@huis-clos.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199810251453.GAA11680@cygnus.com>
Sender: owner-guile@cygnus.com

> Iterators are very un-Schemely, IMO, Scheme is not in the business of
> telling you how to iterate.

What a strange statement!  What do you think map and for-each are?

	--Per Bothner
Cygnus Solutions     bothner@cygnus.com     http://www.cygnus.com/~bothner

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
  - From: hjstein@bfr.co.il (Harvey J. Stein)
- Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu>

References:
- Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Finding the top of the stack
Next by Date: Ulrich's reply on top of stack in glibc 2.1
Prev by thread: Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Scheme style auto-resizing hashtable (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Guile Home | Main Index | Thread Index