Guile Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: generic method names for collections
> This works fine in standard Scheme,
> but for the ref implementation above, (ref ..) would have to return a
> to a pointer to a structure in order to modify it. Which wouldn't work in
> this implementation.
> Or am I missing something?
Yes. The idea is that:
(set! (foo ...) value)
is re-written to:
((setter foo) value ...)
This was discussed in the Guile mailing list recently.
Cygnus Solutions email@example.com http://www.cygnus.com/~bothner
Guile Home |
Main Index |