Guile Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: const correctness?

To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Subject: Re: const correctness?
From: Greg Badros <gjb@cs.washington.edu>
Date: 22 Nov 1998 08:47:24 -0800
Cc: guile@cygnus.com
In-Reply-To: Jim Blandy's message of "22 Nov 1998 02:42:36 -0500"
Message-ID: <qrrn25jektf.fsf@elwha.cs.washington.edu>
References: <13898.61848.218438.128988@dokkum.cs.uu.nl> <wwnaf1kp40j.fsf@totoro.red-bean.com>
Sender: owner-guile@cygnus.com

Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> writes:

> > Are there any plans to have 'const' keywords in the headers of GUILE ?
> > I am a bit confused now, for instance: does gh_eval_str (char *)
> > modify or free() the string you pass it?
> 
> Ken Raeburn has contributed patches to constify Guile's declarations.
> I haven't applied these yet.

Great!  That'll be an exceedingly useful improvement!

Greg

References:
- const correctness?
  - From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@cs.uu.nl>
- Re: const correctness?
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>

Prev by Date: Write barrier notes
Next by Date: sysv ipc
Prev by thread: Re: const correctness?
Next by thread: [PATCH] problems with ice-9/slib.scm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Guile Home | Main Index | Thread Index