Guile Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reintroducing old `defined?'
Clark McGrew <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Marius> I would prefer to stick to `module-defined?' and require
> Marius> people to be explicit about module issues.
> Hmm... Right now, except for slapping define-module, use-modules
> and export on to the front of code, code doesn't need to know
> anything about the module system. One thing I like about the
> current module system is that it is non-intrusive. I hope it stays
> that way.
Yes, `defined?' should interact usefully with the module system, but
it should not require the user to be aware of the module system.
What I was talking about was the things that we want to provide in
addition to `defined?'. When `defined?' is a special form, we need a
function that performs a useful subset of the `defined?'
functionality. I'm happy with the existing `module-defined?' for
Guile Home |
Main Index |