Re: C modules and shared libraries

To: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>
Subject: Re: C modules and shared libraries
From: Ian Grant <I.A.N.Grant@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:17:23 +0100 (BST)
cc: guile@cygnus.com
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <87zp2b7mt6.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990621141604.2075K-100000@susy.amtp.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-guile@cygnus.com

On 7 Jun 1999, Marius Vollmer wrote:

> The only think we should do with Guile at this moment is to beef up
> the dynmic-link function so that the libguiledlopenhelper kluges are
> no longer necessary.  What about extending dynamic-link to take a
> ":global BOOL" keyword argument?  ":global TRUE" would be the default.
> I'll implement that when nobody objects.

Marius, I reckon nobody objects. Tell us when its in CVS.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C modules and shared libraries
  - From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>

References:
- Re: C modules and shared libraries
  - From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>

Prev by Date: Re: corrupt environment?
Next by Date: stk and goops copyright
Prev by thread: Re: C modules and shared libraries
Next by thread: Re: C modules and shared libraries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Guile Home | Main Index | Thread Index