Guile Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ANSI vs. K&R prototypes [was Re: patch for dynl.c]

To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Subject: ANSI vs. K&R prototypes [was Re: patch for dynl.c]
From: Greg Badros <gjb@cs.washington.edu>
Date: 23 Jun 1999 10:09:54 -0700
Cc: guile@cygnus.com
In-Reply-To: Jim Blandy's message of "21 Jun 1999 16:48:23 -0500"
Message-ID: <qrriu8evo65.fsf_-_@elwha.cs.washington.edu>
References: <199906200027.AAA17382@out5.ibm.net> <m3u2s12pjs.fsf@savonarola.red-bean.com>
Sender: owner-guile@cygnus.com

Looks like you're switching to ANSI prototypes... is it okay for me to
update the prototypes in the files I touch for the SMOB stuff (or do you
want it done as more of a single self-contained pass later on)?

Thanks,
Greg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ANSI vs. K&R prototypes [was Re: patch for dynl.c]
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>

References:
- Re: patch for dynl.c
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>

Prev by Date: Re: new to guile, how to go ahead ?
Next by Date: goops and encapsulation
Prev by thread: Re: patch for dynl.c
Next by thread: Re: ANSI vs. K&R prototypes [was Re: patch for dynl.c]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Guile Home | Main Index | Thread Index