Re: [Guile and SLIB (and modules in general)]

[thi <ttn@mingle.glug.org>]

Jan Egil Hagen writes:

 > Even that seems a bit superfluous to me.  It should be possible to use
 > (<whatever>).  Why is the "guile"-part needed?

from the viewpoint of guile being an extension mechanism, it's
appropriate to consider guile modules requiring explicit labels.

from the viewpoint of guile being a development platform, it may not be
appropriate.  but it certainly doesn't hurt.

there have been posts to this mailing list describing mechanisms whereby
you can make module (A B C) look like (X Y Z).  the gist is that you
create (X Y Z), import (A B C) and then export again.

thi