Re: Modules, the lgh interface, compiler options, and more

Jim Blandy (jimb@cyclic.com)
Fri, 6 Sep 1996 16:30:19 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard Stallman: "Re: doc parameter absent?"
Previous message: Paul R. Wilson: "Re: #f vs. '() vs. nil"
In reply to: Paul R. Wilson: "Re: Modules, the lgh interface, compiler options, and more"
Next in thread: Radey Shouman: "Re: Modules, the lgh interface, compiler options, and more"

>Is make-record-type (and accessors, etc.) clearly documented anywhere?
>
>Is it compatible with any other existing Scheme record system, e.g., slib's?

I believe make-record-type is compatible with other Scheme record
systems.

Next message: Richard Stallman: "Re: doc parameter absent?"
Previous message: Paul R. Wilson: "Re: #f vs. '() vs. nil"
In reply to: Paul R. Wilson: "Re: Modules, the lgh interface, compiler options, and more"
Next in thread: Radey Shouman: "Re: Modules, the lgh interface, compiler options, and more"