Not surprising you don't understand; I was dead wrong. I found a
section of the book that seemed to describe the Tk features you said
were missing. I failed to notice that the section was not in the
chapter on creating widgets, but in the chapter on creating Tcl
commands. I withdraw everything I said about Tk. I go to hack some
code, to find out if anything else I said really makes sense.
> Jim Blandy:
> Yes, gh_ is supposed to be a cleaned-up version of scm_. At the
> moment, though, it's missing things. For example, I don't think you
> can define new types and such. gh_apply is also missing.
If we agree that there should be a gh_apply, I am a happy camper.
--
--Keith
This mail message sent by GNU emacs and Linux.
Power to the people. Linux is here.
Food, Shelter, Source code.