>> But if you want to deal with multiple languages like Mule,
Per> Mule is just not suitable for Scheme, because it does not
Per> have a "character" concept
I am in favour of the idea of using Unicode, but just for the sake of
completeness I would like to mention that the XEmacs-20 implementation
of Mule does use characters (unlike Emacs-20 integer implementation).
-- Jens--- Don't steal; thou'lt never thus compete successfully in business. Cheat. -- Ambrose Bierce