Re: guile: going the way of DEATH

Jim Blandy (jimb@red-bean.com)
13 Aug 1998 22:51:23 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Telford Tendys: "gh_ interface (Re: guile: going the way of DEATH)"
Previous message: thi: "Re: Hashtables in guile."
In reply to: Andrew Archibald: "Re: guile: going the way of DEATH"
Next in thread: chrislee@lavash.ius.cs.cmu.edu: "gh and SMOBS [was Re: guile: going the way of DEATH]"
Next in thread: Jonathan Shore: "Re: guile: going the way of DEATH"

The grand plan is:

- gh_ will be the clean and interpreter-independent interface. It
will be sufficient for writing C apps; at the moment, there are some
gaps, which we will fill.

- scm_ will be the interpreter-specific, and possibly
higher-performance interface.

Next message: Telford Tendys: "gh_ interface (Re: guile: going the way of DEATH)"
Previous message: thi: "Re: Hashtables in guile."
In reply to: Andrew Archibald: "Re: guile: going the way of DEATH"
Next in thread: chrislee@lavash.ius.cs.cmu.edu: "gh and SMOBS [was Re: guile: going the way of DEATH]"
Next in thread: Jonathan Shore: "Re: guile: going the way of DEATH"