Distributed repositories

[Lars Segerlund]

  Thanks, you said it a lot better than me.

   I think that the real 'pudels kern' is that distributed repositories 
is missing from a lot of free tools such as cvs, subversion and so on.

  Thus I believe that this is the first target to strive for, since 
patchsets are but a complement to distributed repositories, ( It is 
however essential, and I think necessary for them ).

  any takers ?

Florin Iucha wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Lars Segerlund wrote:
snip ...
> 
> Hmmm.
> 
snip ...
> 
> All the three options can be reduced to one: distributed repositories.
> Then you'll have master-slave/peer-to-peer/project based/developer owned
> repositories. You can do arbitrarily merges up and down (or left and
> right). You can have arbitrarily amounts of history "near" you, but
> not in your working copy.
> 
> florin
>