Idea: Moving sections 'Undoing changes' and 'Resurrecting deleted items'
sussman at red-bean.com
Fri Jun 3 13:57:53 CDT 2005
On Jun 3, 2005, at 1:08 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I'm with Ben -- merge is a complex concept, and the complexity
> grows when you start talking about using that subcommand as a
> mechanism for the unworking of changes. In fact, I don't think
> that any change is necessary at all -- we mustn't allow chapter 3
> to become a table of contents for the rest of the book (that's what
> the Table of Contents is for).
It's just a bit sad, because "undoing a change" is something that
newbies often want to do, and yet the Official Way of doing that
requires learning about a rather complex topic.
Maybe this is why, years ago, people suggested an 'svn rollback'
command, or whatever.
More information about the svnbook-dev