[QUESTION] ch09.xml
Maverick Crank GRey
maverick.crank.grey at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 12:42:38 CDT 2005
Good time of day!
We have the following strings in ch09.xml file.
===
<varlistentry>
<term><option>--><!--force-log</option></term>
<listitem>
<para>Forces a suspicious parameter passed to the
<option>--message</option> (<option>-m</option>) or
<option>--file</option> (<option>-F</option>) options to
be accepted as valid. By default, Subversion will
produce an error if parameters to these options look
like they might instead be targets of the subcommand.
For example, if you pass a versioned file's path to the
<option>--file</option> (<option>-F</option>) option,
Subversion will assume you've made a mistake, that the
path was instead intended as the target of the
operation, and that you simply failed to provide some
other—unversioned—file as the source of your log
message. To assert your intent and override these types
of errors, pass the <option>--force-log</option> option
to commands that accept log messages.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
===
It seems to me, the word "commands" in the last sentence should be
repaced with "subcommands". Is it so?
--
Be Happy!!!
UIN ICQ: 9487080
JUD: MaverickCrankGRey at jabber.ru
More information about the svnbook-dev
mailing list