feedback

[Ben Collins-Sussman]

On Mar 6, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Greg Lorriman wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> In "The Limitations of Mixed Revisions" :
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch02s03.html#svn-ch-2-sect-3.4
>
> I feel that this section does not have the clarity of the rest of the
> page. Particularly I am momentarily confused by both mentions
> of "fully up to date".

Would it be clearer if I just removed the word "fully"?  It's a 
pointless adjective in that context.

> Perhaps a little more context?

Can you be specific?  The whole previous section just discussed how 
working copies can be at mixed-revisions, and defines "out of date".  
What more context/description is needed?

>
> Would you be interested in other "perfectionist" feedback?
>

Absolutely.