[BOOK PATCH] Re: revision no of the WC
maxb at ukf.net
Fri May 6 07:50:36 CDT 2005
kfogel at collab.net wrote:
> It should be in that list. Book authors, here's a patch. I don't
> even know if this compiles (I'm not set up here to build the book),
> but markup problems aside, I think the material itself is probably
> about right.
Should this patch be committed? Issuezilla-ed?
It seems good to me except:
- no documentation of TRAIL_URL
- minor style point: Description and Synopsis sections should be just direct
parts of the enclosing section, for uniformity with the rest of the chapter.
More information about the svnbook-dev