three meanings of "lock"
gareth.mccaughan at pobox.com
Tue Jan 17 19:39:46 CST 2006
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 03:44, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> > [me:]
> >>> I think this could be improved by adding a brief section,
> >>> perhaps somewhere under "Locking" or after the first use of
> >>> the word "lock" or one of its cognates, on the meanings of "lock",
> >>> and by taking a little care with terminology in places where
> >>> there's most danger of confusion.
> >> [...]
> >>> If this is considered a good idea, I'm happy to grab the latest
> >>> XML sources and submit a patch.
> > [CMike:]
> >> (Speaking only for myself, of course.) This is considered a good
> >> idea.
> > Any dissenting voices?
> I would also consider it a good idea. That 's two out of three. :-)
Sounds sufficient to go ahead. If no patch from me appears in, say,
the next week, anyone who cares about this should feel free to harass
More information about the svnbook-dev