ch02: Ambiguous wording in example
Brian W. Fitzpatrick
fitz at red-bean.com
Thu Aug 14 22:58:54 CDT 2008
I'm fine with making both of these. Cmpilato, what do you think? Is
it too late?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at gmx.li> wrote:
> Some more for the same section:
> If you've postponed a conflict,...
> should be
> If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
> "replaceable" elements.
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
More information about the svnbook-dev