ch02: Ambiguous wording in example

C. Michael Pilato cmpilato at red-bean.com
Fri Aug 15 00:48:55 CDT 2008


As with the other recent suggestions, I'll see what I can do.  We're 
currently in a don't-touch-the-XML mode at ORA.  We can make these changes 
immediately to our own source tree, though.  I'll try to do so later today 
(Friday).

Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm fine with making both of these.  Cmpilato, what do you think?  Is
> it too late?
> 
> -Fitz
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at gmx.li> wrote:
>> Some more for the same section:
>>
>>  If you've postponed a conflict,...
>>
>> should be
>>
>>  If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
>>
>> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
>> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
>> "replaceable" elements.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jens
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> svnbook-dev mailing list
>> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
>> http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev
>>


-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/

"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has
  been found difficult; and left untried."  -- G. K. Chesterton




More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list