Proposal: move svnbook svn repository to Google Code
C. Michael Pilato
cmpilato at red-bean.com
Thu Aug 21 09:14:33 CDT 2008
I'd rather not churn things while we're still finishing up VCWS2e. So, I
guess that's an objection. But at least it's one with an expiration date! :-)
Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Well, if I don't hear any objections, I'll probably do this next week.
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> <cmpilato at red-bean.com> wrote:
>> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>> Full disclosure: I'm the engineering manager for Google Code, and Ben
>>> is the Tech Lead.
>>> Based on the load on red-bean.com and myriad other issues with that
>>> machine, I'd like to propose that we:
>>> - Move our Subversion repository to Google Code
>>> - Start using Google Code's issue tracker instead of trac, which has
>>> some issues with submissions from non-registered folks (cmpilato can
>>> expound upon this).
>>> That's pretty much it. What do you guys think?
>> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/
>> "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has
>> been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has
been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton
More information about the svnbook-dev