Translation citizenship -- tree reorg needed?

[Dongsheng Song]

2009/2/6 Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net>:
>> PS: Because xml2po and po4a not compatible, thereby zh have much fuzzy
>> strings.
>
> Can you confirm that po4a is better or am I wrong?
>
xml2po looks like unmaintained or not active.

> PS: I do not like all ifdef-logic in the Makefile. It can probably be simplified
> using a trick. po4a allows also using of a config file so that the arguments
> in the Makefile can be shortened. This is just a note, for the whole discussion
> it is completely unimportant and I suggest you first try to convince people
> that PO format may be a good idea. I think you agree with this?
>

Yes, but they can't force we use po(since we are not force them use po,
they can use xml freely), isn't it?

---
Dongsheng Song