[svnbook] r3881 committed - * src/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml...

Daniel Shahaf d.s at daniel.shahaf.name
Thu Jul 7 19:02:23 CDT 2011


svnbook at googlecode.com wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 17:17:04 +0000:
> Revision: 3881
> Author:   cmpilato at gmail.com
> Date:     Tue Jul  5 10:14:12 2011
> Log:      * src/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml
>   (svn.branchmerge.using.create): Tighten up the scope of "every file
>     and subdirectory" a bit.
> 
> Suggested by: Neil Brown <neilx.d.brown at intel.com>
>               (Tweaked by me.)
> http://code.google.com/p/svnbook/source/detail?r=3881
> 
> Modified:
>  /trunk/src/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml
> 
> =======================================
> --- /trunk/src/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml	Tue Jul  5
> 09:25:22 2011
> +++ /trunk/src/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml	Tue Jul  5
> 10:14:12 2011
> @@ -198,10 +198,10 @@
>          copy, this technique isn't recommended.  It can be quite slow,
>          in fact!  Copying a directory on the client side is a
>          linear-time operation, in that it actually has to duplicate
> +        every file and subdirectory within that working copy directory
> +        on the local disk.  Copying a directory on the server,
> +        however, is a constant-time operation, and it's the way most
> +        people create branches.</para>

May want to underline that the server-side storage is O(1) regardless of
how the copy is committed.

> 
>        <figure id="svn.branchmerge.using.create.dia-1">
>          <title>Repository with new copy</title>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
> http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev




More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list