search results and book versions was: Re: [proposed] remove docs/1.3/

C. Michael Pilato cmpilato at
Tue Feb 28 12:39:02 CST 2012

Might be good even for the newer versions of the book, since those are going
to be more up-to-date than even the other copies thereof that spring up
around the web.

On 02/28/2012 12:56 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>> <link rel="canonical" href=""/> 
>> ..
>> For example, searching Google for "rewriterule" has long given the 1.3
>> Rewrite Guide, but within 24 hours of adding a rel canonical tag, it
>> started pointing to the 2.2 mod_rewrite docs as the top hit.
> Something to consider doing for the 1.6-and-earlier versions of the book?
> Daniel
> (spotted that on dev at httpd)
> _______________________________________________
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at

More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list