sussman at red-bean.com
Sat Aug 6 18:22:04 CDT 2005
On Aug 4, 2005, at 3:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i just grepped the XML files for the latest rev of the book, and
> there was no mention of the phrase "sandbox" being a historical
> alternative to "working copy".
> is it worth maybe just mentioning that once, perhaps on the page
> that introduces the svn architecture diagram, even in passing? after
> all, the word "sandbox" definitely occurs in the mailing list, so
> people are using it.
It does? I've never seen an svn developer use that term on the dev@
list. Nor have I seen it mentioned much (at all) on the users@ list.
More information about the svnbook-dev