a few more observations on the book
sussman at red-bean.com
Sat Aug 6 18:53:52 CDT 2005
On Aug 4, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ch 1:
> - the paragraph describing creating the subdirectories "trunk",
> "branches" and "tags" seems misleadingly adamant that these
> directories should be created and that they should have *exactly*
> those names. maybe you clarify later that they don't actually have to
> called precisely that, but readers might get the impression here that
> there's something magic and mandatory about those names.
> ch 2:
> "Working Copies"
> - this might be a good place to offhandedly mention that a working
> copy is equivalent to what others would call a "sandbox", and leave it
> at that
See previous mail.
> - you might also casually mention that you can have multiple working
> copies going at once. yes, i know that's trivially obvious, but some
> readers might not pick up on that. (i only mention that since you use
> the phrase "Your working copy" as if there is only one of them.)
More information about the svnbook-dev