[svnbook commit] r1904 - in trunk/src/en: . book

[C. Michael Pilato]

maxb wrote:

> +  * Either of the Python bindings examples are easily able to cause an
> +    is_canonical assert.  To be fair, this is more the fault of the bindings
> +    than of the examples, but I'm noting the issue here since it does affect
> +    first impressions of the book.

Perhaps we should just add os.path.normpath() wrappers to the sample 
code and be done with it?