RFC: Kill the "do not link" request.
sussman at red-bean.com
Wed Mar 1 11:36:00 CST 2006
Seems reasonable to me.
On 3/1/06, Max Bowsher <maxb1 at ukf.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> index.html says:
> Nightly Build (for Subversion 1.2)
> These versions are still works-in-progress, so we ask that
> you do not bookmark or link to these versions.
> I totally don't understand why the fact that the book trunk is a
> work-in-progress means people should not link to it - especially when
> the pace of development is so slow, and lagging behind the latest
> versions of Subversion anyway.
> Therefore, I propose to rewrite that sentence to read:
> Please bear in mind that these versions are works-in-progress: if you
> bookmark or link to specific sections, those links may be invalidated
> by continuing development. If you need a link that can be reasonably
> expected to remain stable for years to come, link to one of the
> completed editions below.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
More information about the svnbook-dev