ch02: Ambiguous wording in example
C. Michael Pilato
cmpilato at red-bean.com
Fri Aug 15 00:48:55 CDT 2008
As with the other recent suggestions, I'll see what I can do. We're
currently in a don't-touch-the-XML mode at ORA. We can make these changes
immediately to our own source tree, though. I'll try to do so later today
Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm fine with making both of these. Cmpilato, what do you think? Is
> it too late?
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at gmx.li> wrote:
>> Some more for the same section:
>> If you've postponed a conflict,...
>> should be
>> If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
>> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
>> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
>> "replaceable" elements.
>> svnbook-dev mailing list
>> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has
been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton
More information about the svnbook-dev