ch02: Ambiguous wording in example
Brian W. Fitzpatrick
fitz at red-bean.com
Fri Aug 15 01:35:37 CDT 2008
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato
<cmpilato at red-bean.com> wrote:
> As with the other recent suggestions, I'll see what I can do. We're
> currently in a don't-touch-the-XML mode at ORA. We can make these changes
> immediately to our own source tree, though. I'll try to do so later today
> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> I'm fine with making both of these. Cmpilato, what do you think? Is
>> it too late?
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at gmx.li> wrote:
>>> Some more for the same section:
>>> If you've postponed a conflict,...
>>> should be
>>> If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
>>> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
>>> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
>>> "replaceable" elements.
>>> svnbook-dev mailing list
>>> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/
> "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has
> been found difficult; and left untried." -- G. K. Chesterton
More information about the svnbook-dev