ch02: Ambiguous wording in example

[Brian W. Fitzpatrick]

Cool.  Thanks.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato
<cmpilato at red-bean.com> wrote:
> As with the other recent suggestions, I'll see what I can do.  We're
> currently in a don't-touch-the-XML mode at ORA.  We can make these changes
> immediately to our own source tree, though.  I'll try to do so later today
> (Friday).
>
> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>
>> I'm fine with making both of these.  Cmpilato, what do you think?  Is
>> it too late?
>>
>> -Fitz
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at gmx.li> wrote:
>>>
>>> Some more for the same section:
>>>
>>>  If you've postponed a conflict,...
>>>
>>> should be
>>>
>>>  If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
>>>
>>> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
>>> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
>>> "replaceable" elements.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jens
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> svnbook-dev mailing list
>>> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
>>> http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev
>>>
>
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/
>
> "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has
>  been found difficult; and left untried."  -- G. K. Chesterton
>