[PATCH] Suggested change to svnadmin setrevprop summary

[C. Michael Pilato]

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Wim Lewis <wiml at hhhh.org> wrote:

> As I understand it the command really sets a (named) property on a
> revision, not the "property name" on a revision. (The first line of the
> description uses the same phrasing as the old refpurpose, but the
> <replaceable> markup makes all the difference in interpretation!)
>
> I considered text like "Set a named property on a revision" but decided
> that that could cause confusion to a new reader about whether Subversion has
> both named and unnamed properties --- the command description makes it clear
> that properties do, in fact, have names.


r3228.  Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.red-bean.com/pipermail/svnbook-dev/attachments/20080729/9017de5b/attachment-0001.html>