Translation citizenship -- tree reorg needed?
dongsheng.song at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 16:45:41 CST 2009
2009/2/6 Jens Seidel <jensseidel at users.sf.net>:
>> PS: Because xml2po and po4a not compatible, thereby zh have much fuzzy
> Can you confirm that po4a is better or am I wrong?
xml2po looks like unmaintained or not active.
> PS: I do not like all ifdef-logic in the Makefile. It can probably be simplified
> using a trick. po4a allows also using of a config file so that the arguments
> in the Makefile can be shortened. This is just a note, for the whole discussion
> it is completely unimportant and I suggest you first try to convince people
> that PO format may be a good idea. I think you agree with this?
Yes, but they can't force we use po(since we are not force them use po,
they can use xml freely), isn't it?
More information about the svnbook-dev