A typo in chapter 4
C. Michael Pilato
cmpilato at red-bean.com
Wed Nov 8 08:52:07 CST 2017
You are correct. And, oddly enough, the 1.7 branch has this correct. Oh!
I see. The 1.7 branch was cut before Paul reworked the 'svn blame'
examples on trunk. So 1.7 refers to "button.c" correctly; trunk refers
incorrectly to "Makefile".
I've committed your patch to trunk (though I made it use "src/button.c"
instead of just "button.c"), and will not backport it because that would be
the wrong thing to do.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui250 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Mike
> According to the context (examples followed), I think the file should be
> instead of Makefile. Am I right?
> Index: trunk/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml
> diff --git a/trunk/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml
> --- a/trunk/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml (revision 5484)
> +++ b/trunk/en/book/ch04-branching-and-merging.xml (working copy)
> @@ -2909,7 +2909,7 @@ Refactor the bazzle functions.
> <para>The <command>svn blame</command> command also takes the
> <option>--use-merge-history</option> (<option>-g</option>)
> option. If this option is neglected, somebody looking at
> - a line-by-line annotation of <filename>Makefile</filename> may
> + a line-by-line annotation of <filename>button.c</filename> may
> get the mistaken impression that you were responsible for a
> particular change:</para>
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the svnbook-dev