question about the section on vendor branches

[Blair Zajac]

On 12/3/10 9:33 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Alvin, I've not been able to full process your question.  But you should
> know that the Vendor Branches section of the book is one of its oldest and
> least-maintained.  It could really stand to be completely rewritten, ideally
> introducing new concepts such as the support for foreign repository merges.
>   (And anything we can do to avoid a doc dependency on svn_load_dirs.pl is a
> good thing, as none of the book authors has ever even used that tool!)

However, one of the book contributors wrote that tool!

Blair