sussman at red-bean.com
Sun Mar 6 08:16:58 CST 2005
On Mar 6, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Greg Lorriman wrote:
> In "The Limitations of Mixed Revisions" :
> I feel that this section does not have the clarity of the rest of the
> page. Particularly I am momentarily confused by both mentions
> of "fully up to date".
Would it be clearer if I just removed the word "fully"? It's a
pointless adjective in that context.
> Perhaps a little more context?
Can you be specific? The whole previous section just discussed how
working copies can be at mixed-revisions, and defines "out of date".
What more context/description is needed?
> Would you be interested in other "perfectionist" feedback?
More information about the svnbook-dev